Re: A89: RE: rom checksum

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: RE: rom checksum
From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 20:19:49 -0500
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


>But who's to say it has to be a 56-bit RSA?  Didn't the government just
>approve Netscape's 128-bit encryption to be exported outside the U.S.?  And
>besides, TI has a French unit too.  They could do the encryption stuff in
>France and ship to the U.S.

The Netscape thing was a mistake -- that's a press release from 1997
(loooong ago), and it ONLY allowed 128 bit encryption transfers btw.
Netscape browsers and secure servers

    -Scott

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: RE: rom checksum

From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

Prev: Re: A89: Re: 89 on SAT's
Next: Re: A89: Alignment Error
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread