Re: A89: Re: Re: grrrrr 2.03
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: Re: grrrrr 2.03
Uh, then use the 512-bit RSA encryption key because they do not want
anyone other than TI to make a rom. TI put alot of work into making AMS
x.0x. I mean, if someone made a rom and flashed it in, the only thing
that would say TI would be the casing, and I am pretty sure they dont
want that. Besides, if you want to make your own rom, just make your
own hand-held console.
- Matt
Bryan Rabeler wrote:
>
> And that's why they are using a 512-bit RSA encryption key huh? :)
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "root" <root@cc480554-c.catv1.md.home.com>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 9:47 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: grrrrr 2.03
>
> >
> >
> > Umm....TI isn't trying to stop ppl from programming in ASM :P Why would
> > they include "built-in" assembly support if they didn't want stuff
> > programmed in it ;) And TI signed TCPA's game pack did they not? :) This
> > kinda proves that TI isn't against us programming this stuff. They are
> > just lazy and figure we can figure out where new addy's are in new ROM
> > versions :P
> >
> > -Tim
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 Cyong0@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > No, there are no "easier' stuff in v2.03. In case you haven't heard, TI
> > > doesn't like people enhancing their calculators, in fact this is an
> obvious
> > > attempt to prevent people like us from programming stuff (besides the
> fact
> > > programmers are sorta breakin' the law by making "tetris" and "Street
> Fighter
> > > II" games which are copyrighted
> > >
> > > Then again we could just call the games "Zetris" and "Fighters who just
> so
> > > happened to be on the Street II"...:P
> > >
> >
> >
> >
References: