Re: A89: Re: Re: grrrrr 2.03

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: grrrrr 2.03
From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 20:39:15 -0600
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912092245560.475-100000@cc480554-c.catv1.md.home.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


And that's why they are using a 512-bit RSA encryption key huh? :)

Bryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "root" <root@cc480554-c.catv1.md.home.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: grrrrr 2.03


>
>
> Umm....TI isn't trying to stop ppl from programming in ASM :P Why would
> they include "built-in" assembly support if they didn't want stuff
> programmed in it ;) And TI signed TCPA's game pack did they not? :) This
> kinda proves that TI isn't against us programming this stuff. They are
> just lazy and figure we can figure out where new addy's are in new ROM
> versions :P
>
> -Tim
>
> On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 Cyong0@aol.com wrote:
>
> >
> > No, there are no "easier' stuff in v2.03.  In case you haven't heard, TI
> > doesn't like people enhancing their calculators, in fact this is an
obvious
> > attempt to prevent people like us from programming stuff (besides the
fact
> > programmers are sorta breakin' the law by making "tetris" and "Street
Fighter
> > II" games which are copyrighted
> >
> > Then again we could just call the games "Zetris" and "Fighters who just
so
> > happened to be on the Street II"...:P
> >
>
>
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: Re: Re: grrrrr 2.03

From: mhlandry <mhlandry@bellsouth.net>

References:

Re: A89: Re: Re: grrrrr 2.03

From: root <root@cc480554-c.catv1.md.home.com>