A89: TI cares? (was Re: A89: Re: Re: Cracking AMS 2.01)

A89: TI cares? (was Re: A89: Re: Re: Cracking AMS 2.01)

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: A89: TI cares? (was Re: A89: Re: Re: Cracking AMS 2.01)
• From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Risto_J=E4rvinen?= <rjarvine@cc.hut.fi>
• Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:57:14 +0200 (EET)
• In-Reply-To: <013701bf3c98$0ced0a20$10ebe498@valpo.edu>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Bryan Rabeler wrote:
> Maybe, but there are far more teachers, educators, students who don't play
> games, than you think.  How many people are on this list?  Maybe 100 or 200
> people?  How many people in the world do you think own a TI-89?

What portion of the people who own Ti-89 are customers of TI?
What portion of assembler programmers are harmed by the 8kB limit?
How many new customers does TI gain by imposing the 8kB limit?

Has anyone asked TI "why?"  I think I will.

	- Riba

• Re: A89: TI cares? (was Re: A89: Re: Re: Cracking AMS 2.01)
• From: "M. Adam Davis" <adavis@ubasics.com>
• Re: TI cares? (was Re: A89: Re: Re: Cracking AMS 2.01)
• From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

• A89: Re: Re: Cracking AMS 2.01
• From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

• Prev: Re: A89: PR Hit -- Those bastards
• Next: Re: A89: PR Hit -- Those bastards
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread