Re: A89: compiler

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: compiler
From: Daniel <dsrogers@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:56:41 -0700
In-Reply-To: <37E25458.7FF7C8A0@hem.passagen.se>
References: <19990917034505.84555.qmail@hotmail.com> <v04210100b407fb8d82d1@[24.5.218.218]> <37E25458.7FF7C8A0@hem.passagen.se>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


>what would then the point of having the compiler on calc be?
>It makes the on-calc compiler even more pointless...
>as long as you can't have it as a flash-applet (or what they are called) so it
>isn't erased when your calc crashes, it is quite useless to programm with..
>cause it WILL crash. not even the best of programmers write totally 
>bugfree code
>immidiatly.
>
>//Olle

Umm what about us mac users that don't have a compiler otherwise?

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: compiler

From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

References:

A89: compiler

From: "Matt Baker" <po2084@hotmail.com>

Re: A89: compiler

From: Daniel <dsrogers@uclink4.berkeley.edu>

Re: A89: compiler

From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>