Re: A89: Re: Shells

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Shells
From: Jimmy =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5rdell?= <yarin@acc.umu.se>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 16:00:31 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <011a01bdffbc$def0cee0$5910e6a5@Sammy.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


At 22:11 1998-10-24 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>>Talking about shells; how do I compile something that doesn't require
>>a shell? PlusShell looked ok, except for the fact that you don't
>>get any error when accessing a label which doesn't exist! (because of
>>the -g parameter).
>
>Yeah, I found that out the hard way (a crash).  All you have to do, though,
>is edit asm89.bat, taking out -g.  Everything I've compiled for PlusShell
>hasn't required a shell on the calc.

Huh? That didn't work for me. I tried to compile nibbles.asm without
the -g, and it gives the error "Undefined symbol" on every _ROM_CALL_xxx
in tios.h

--
Real name:     Jimmy Mårdell
Email:         mailto:yarin@acc.umu.se
Homepage:      http://www.acc.umu.se/~yarin/

Icarus Productions homepage: http://icarus.ganymed.org/

References:

A89: Re: Shells

From: "Dux Gregis" <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>