A89: Re: Shells

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: A89: Re: Shells
From: "Dux Gregis" <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 22:11:05 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org



>Talking about shells; how do I compile something that doesn't require
>a shell? PlusShell looked ok, except for the fact that you don't
>get any error when accessing a label which doesn't exist! (because of
>the -g parameter).

Yeah, I found that out the hard way (a crash).  All you have to do, though,
is edit asm89.bat, taking out -g.  Everything I've compiled for PlusShell
hasn't required a shell on the calc.

 That makes any serious programming impossible.
>And Doors OS seems to require that you have the kernel on the calc (?)
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: Re: Shells

From: Jimmy =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5rdell?= <yarin@acc.umu.se>

Prev: A89: Re: link cable fat thing
Next: A89: Link cable, HELP!
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread