Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?

Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?
• From: Xavier VASSOR - The Doors Team <doors@altern.org>
• Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 22:36:14 +0100
• Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19981122143741.007568c4@dodgenet.com>
• References: <3.0.1.32.19981122122254.00703da0@altern.org> <3.0.1.32.19981121210451.0075b264@dodgenet.com> <c447e372.36576dab@aol.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

>Does the Plusshell browser still work with DoorOS?  If not, is there a
>browser for DoorsOS?  
 Yes it should work.


>At 12:22 PM 11/22/98 +0100, you wrote:
>>
>>>I realize this question has probably been answered several times:  Which
>>>one should I use?
>>>
>>>The way I understand it, they both operate the same way now.  So which one
>>>is going to be the standard?
>>Personnaly I think they are both standards because they are compatible now.
>>The advantage of DoorsOS is the AntiCrash protection which recovers most
>>crashes.
>>
>>
>>Xavier VASSOR
>>---The Doors Team
>>E-mail:xvassor@mail.dotcom.fr
>>Doors Homepage: http://www.altern.org/doors
>>ICQ:10241721
>>
>>
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> % Michael R. Newman          http://www.dodgenet.com/~miken %
> % miken@dodgenet.com                         ICQ #: 2114458 %
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>


Xavier VASSOR
---The Doors Team
E-mail:xvassor@mail.dotcom.fr
Doors Homepage: http://www.altern.org/doors
ICQ:10241721

• Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?
• From: Xavier VASSOR - The Doors Team <doors@altern.org>
• A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?
• From: Mike Newman <miken@dodgenet.com>
• A89: Converting files for plusshell
• From: IxJLWxI@aol.com
• Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?
• From: Mike Newman <miken@dodgenet.com>

• Prev: A89: Basic question
• Next: Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread