Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?

Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?
• From: Xavier VASSOR - The Doors Team <doors@altern.org>
• Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 12:22:54 +0100
• Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19981121210451.0075b264@dodgenet.com>
• References: <c447e372.36576dab@aol.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

>I realize this question has probably been answered several times:  Which
>one should I use?
>
>The way I understand it, they both operate the same way now.  So which one
>is going to be the standard?
Personnaly I think they are both standards because they are compatible now.
The advantage of DoorsOS is the AntiCrash protection which recovers most
crashes.


Xavier VASSOR
---The Doors Team
E-mail:xvassor@mail.dotcom.fr
Doors Homepage: http://www.altern.org/doors
ICQ:10241721

• Re: A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?
• From: Mike Newman <miken@dodgenet.com>

• A89: Converting files for plusshell
• From: IxJLWxI@aol.com
• A89: PlusShell or DoorsOS?
• From: Mike Newman <miken@dodgenet.com>

• Prev: Re: A89: Help with RclPic
• Next: A89: Exec function in PlusShell, Please HELP !!!
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread