Re: A89: Re: Survey for the next version of PlusShell

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
From: Daniel7073@aol.com
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 20:52:24 EST
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Just because the TI-89 has a lot of RAM (188k and 384k archive) doesn't mean
we should waste it.  Though now it seems like a lot, as more games come out,
we will wish we had libraries.

In a message dated 11/17/1998 1:11:02 PM Pacific Standard Time,
assets@eden.rutgers.edu writes:

> alright, if you're so intent on saving space w/ libraries, why not just use
>  a compression program to compress your whole ram :-)
>  really, the 86 doesn't use libraries; the 89 has something like 5 times the
>  user mem of the 86

Prev: Re: A89: Re: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
Next: Re: A89: Re: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread