Re: A89: Word processor

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Word processor
From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 17:36:51 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


If we had a printer (maybe the GBprinter?) to hook up to the calc, then I would see a use for this.
Otherwise, just use the built-in text editor.  What would be the point of transfering documents
cross-calc, when you could probably explain whatever is in the document a lot faster by your mouth.

-Miles Raymond

-----Original Message-----
From: Jkhum98@aol.com <Jkhum98@aol.com>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Wednesday, November 04, 1998 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Word processor


>In a message dated 11/04/98 5:43:05 PM, IANKAPLAN@aol.com writes:
>
>>Not to be mean, but what is the point of a word processor, if you do not
>>have
>>a printer.  Also what are you going to do, print it out through the graph
>>link
>>software on your computer when you get home.  If you can invent a printer
>>through the port at the bottom it would be alright
>
>ooh, what if we could all get those little tabulating machines that spits out
>the roles of paper while making a helluva lot of noise in the process...? We
>could then configure this idealistic 'Word Processor for a Calculator' to
>output stuff to that one. There's your printer! ;)  I guess that could be all
>interpreted as sarcasm... =P
>Hey lets not waste our time on a wordprocessor , but how about a Shell that
>people can actually use!? Hey Hey, There's an idea! ;)
> --Jason K.