Re: A89: help

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: help
From: Nate Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 21:11:33 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <001f01be2c8f$0ff03ae0$736d2399@computer>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


>When I used my 85, it had ZShell that could detect BASIC programs, so don't
>say it's not possible.  The shells that had the programs already in them
>were written in BASIC.  Even when USguard was still written in BASIC, it
>could detect basic from asm programs.  I do agree, though, that the shells
>should be designed to detect and run BASIC programs.
>    led__zeppelin@msn.com

You're right, I was thinking about BASIC shells, sorry.

	--Nate

References:

Re: A89: help

From: "David Demers" <led__zeppelin@email.msn.com>

Prev: Re: A89: help
Next: Re: A89: excuse me, but can we all just cut the whining and talk about asm?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread