Re: A89: help

Re: A89: help

• To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A89: help
• From: "David Demers" <led__zeppelin@email.msn.com>
• Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 22:07:11 -0500
• Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

When I used my 85, it had ZShell that could detect BASIC programs, so don't
say it's not possible.  The shells that had the programs already in them
were written in BASIC.  Even when USguard was still written in BASIC, it
could detect basic from asm programs.  I do agree, though, that the shells
should be designed to detect and run BASIC programs.
    led__zeppelin@msn.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, December 20, 1998 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: A89: help


>
>not true.  on the calcs that have asm support the program variable begins
>with a token to identify the program as asm
>how do you think the calc knows when it can and can't run a program using
>the asm( command?
>
>>
>>I don't know that this is the case with the 89, but on earlier calcs you
>>couldn't detect BASIC programs.  The shells that did run them had to be
>>edited to include the programs you wanted to run (most just came with a
>>bunch already included).
>>
>> --Nate
>

• Re: A89: help
• From: Nate Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>

• Prev: Re: A89: help
• Next: Re: A89: help
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread