Re: A86: Re: anything useful to say?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A86: Re: anything useful to say?




I didn't start this thread, iDanny did... is it idiotic to defend yourself
against such false accusations?

Bryan

----- Original Message -----
From: <Cliff320@aol.com>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: anything useful to say?


>
> Ardvark, you may need to rethink your argument.  Although Bryan was a vital
> member of the Ti community in the past, things may have changed.  Take for
> example Joesph Stalin (no relation to the ticalc debate, we're just studying
> him in history), started out very poor, but worked and eventually became the
> leader who was able to fight of Germany and swiftly industralize the USSR.
> But during and after this process he destroyed individual freedom and caused
> millions of death.  The analogy is that even if you do great things, it does
> not at all excuse the idiotic things that you do. (namely this stupid spammy
> thread)
>
> K, I'm done venting
> Cliff
>
> In a message dated 1/19/00 12:18:35 AM Central Standard Time,
> TGaArdvark@aol.com writes:
>
> >
> >  Bryan Rabeler was the only active member of these lists
> >  on the ticalc.org staff until he was no longer on the staff.
> >  And then there was nobody.  He is one of the most
> >  experienced and knowledgeable people on this
> >  list regarding TI calculators.  And unlike all of the other
> >  experienced members of this list, he gives up huge
> >  amounts of his personal time to make sure every
> >  question ever posted on any ticalc.org list that he knows
> >  the answer to is answered accurately, completely, and
> >  simply.  Bryan responds promptly (by far the most
> >  promptly of anyone on these lists) to any on-topic
> >  question he knows the answer to (which is a very large
> >  number of them).  This is a huge sacrifice on his part that
> >  he is almost never given credit for.  Bryan has made a
> >  HUGE contribution to the calculator community,
> >  ESPECIALLY on these lists.  DO NOT ACCUSE HIM
> >  OF BEING DETRIMENTAL TO THESE LISTS AGAIN.
>
>



References: