Re: Re[2]: A86: Re: anything useful to say?

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Re[2]: A86: Re: anything useful to say?


> Actually, I tried to communicate with bryan via AIM, it didnt work real well
> seeing as he likes the attention of everyone reading what he says on the


What do you mean it didn't work well?  I think we had a very substanstive
discussion.


> list. Bryan, also in responding to the off-topic comments list you made, I
> won't even make a record of yours, one because I'm not a total loser and
> don't have that much free time, and because it would be far too long. If I'm


Well, you told me you had *never* posted off-topic until a few days ago, and
that is simply not true.  You should get the facts right before you start
publically accusing people of things.


> not wrong, you even started a couple of the threads. Now my question to you
> is, have you ever even started a non-off-topic thread? Have you ever posted a
> on-topic mail? Nope. Thankyou. Now directly to Cliff...is it? Do you know


Have I ever started an off-topic thread?  Sure, I probably have.  So what?  Have
I ever posted an on-topic message?  Yes, I have posted many.


> either me or Bryan beyond the list? I don't think you know me. How long have
> you been on the list? If you were on it since Bryan was fired, you'd know why


I've been on the list since it was created, back in 1997.  I'm sure you don't go
back that far.


> I was fed up with his off-topic posting, mainly because it's all he post.


Not true.  I would post more on-topic things if I wasn't so busy defending
myself against your attacks which are largly untrue.


> Bryan does not know z80 ASM, Bryan is not even trying to lear z80 ASM to my
> knowledge, now I ask you, why is he on the list? I can give a fairly good


I'm on this list so I can stay up to date with information regarding the TI-86
and any new programs that come out.


> answer. Pretty much no one in a TI-Related channel on EFNet IRC likes him.
> Therefore he was banned from every channel because all he would talk about


Not true.


> was ticalc.org and how communist they are, so now he needs someone to hear
> him, because some way he thinks it will help, and he chose us. It sucks,


Does it also suck that we have to listen to all your rants about whether or not
someone has something useful to say or not?  About whether someone should be on
the list or not?


> infact, I talked to bryan and he says that he's not even off-topic because
> its a ticalc.org list, therefore anything about ticalc.org is not off-topic.


I didn't say _anything_ about ticalc.org is not off-topic.  But if something
regarding ticalc.org comes up, lets say the www server goes down or they post
some blately false information about the TI-86, then you could bring up such
topics.  To say you can't talk about ticalc.org on a ticalc.org list is stupid.


> This couldn't be more false, this list is about Assembly for the TI-86, not
> some hate mail list for ticalc.org...Bryan, sorry, let it go, you're fired,


I /usually/ don't flame ticalc.org on this list.  I believe this whole
discussion came up because ticalc.org revoked my comment posting privilages
indefinately for no reason, and refused to give an answer about why.  And they
still refuse to give an answer.  But I don't post hate mail.


> now I see why, release ti-user.org so you can stop telling people it's going
> to be better than all the current sites combined because I don't buy it


Well then you'll be surprised I guess.


> anymore. This will be my last and final reply to anything along the lines of
> the past threads.


Ok good.


> Thankyou,
> Danny


Bryan
Follow-Ups: References: