Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
From: TGaArdvark@aol.com
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 16:43:48 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


> I'm guessing the capacity of Renewals are lower than
> regular alkaline since I recharged them once a week
> (when the screen was at 6) I might have crapped them
> the day I got them because I did something, then read
> the instructions and it said to never do it :) i forget
> what I did though... The best way to go is the new
> Nickel Metal Hydrades that have a capacity of about
> 500mah(?) where as most NiCads have 120mah.
> They also have no memory so you can recharge them
> anytime you like with no ill effects (like before SATs
> and APs)
> terrence

I bought an 89 last September and haven't changed
or recharged the batteries yet.  The low battery
indicator just came on 15 minutes ago.  I don't use
that calc incredibly often, but it gets above-average
use.  (I am using the original Renewals.)

Prev: Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
Next: Re: A86: network
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread