Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
I agree. I like reading some of the OTs, and sometimes not. Either way, I hit
delete when I'm done.
terrence
J D wrote:
> Chill out, man! OT threads die out on their own when no one responds to
> them after a while. Is it killing you to press Delete one more time?
>
> >WHAT THE HELL DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH ASM PROGRAMMING?
> >you idiots need to take your F*#&ing hardware questions to the group
> >THEY BELONG IN!!!
> >
> >from a pissed off< which is better than pissed on>
> >
> >Jason
> >
> >From the desk of Eugene Dirks <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>.
> > At 21:51 Eugene Dirks wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > most rechargeables are 1.2v but the renewals are the full 1.5v. i've had
> > > mine for over a year at the fast speed and haven't needed to replace the
> > > rayovac renewals, they still recharge just fine... oh well maybe
> > > performance varries ----- Original Message ----- From: warhorse
> > > <warhorse@bellatlantic.net> To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org> Sent:
> > > Wednesday, May 12, 1999 4:53 PM Subject: Re: A86: Theory question [i
> >think
> > > its about time we....]
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I use rechargebles, but the voltage is always lower. I use those cause
> > > they
> > > > charge 1000 times, whereas I burned a set of renewals in a semester.
> > > > terrence
> > > >
> > > > Eugene Dirks wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ok i just have to jump in on this one... i haven't found a method to
> > > > > actually clock my calc's mHz, but through the method i chose (just
> > > removing
> > > > > the capacitor) i've heard and read in many places that it is about
> > > > > 3.5x faster. 21mhz more or less. I have actually heard of someone
> > > > > saying
> > > they
> > > > > were able to determine that it does in fact run that fast.
> > > > >
> > > > > the point...
> > > > > use rayovac renewal batteries in your calc. at the speed mine is
> > > running i
> > > > > still only recharge the batteries every month or so, even then they
> > > don't
> > > > > really need it, it just seems to be slightly faster when recharged.
> > > > >
> > > > > there is not as you suggested a minimal speed increase. it is a
> >huge
> > > speed
> > > > > in crease. you especially notice this when graphing complicated
> > > functions
> > > > > and also on long integrals.
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Cassady Roop <croop@oregontrail.net>
> > > > > To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 1999 8:46 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And how long would the batteries last at 12 MHz? I'm no processor
> > > > > > expert, but it seems to me that faster things always take much
> >more
> > > > > > power. For a minimally noticeable speed increase (at least in
> > > > > > TI-OS) you might drop your battery life 50% or more...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was thinking... you can get a 20 MHz Z80 for $12...
> > > > > > > I f you removed the chip currently in there, and
> > > > > > > replaced it with one of those, the calc should run a
> > > > > > > lot faster (the bus and memory access would slow it
> > > > > > > down, but it should still be a fair amount faster...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> >
> >Zeneca@earthling.net
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: 2.6.2
> >
> >iQCVAwUBNzWxkd38AIpGqCZ1AQFvEgQAsQ+q0l5Ul68tUSrVaHt1Nc0nBvGG2cLQ
> >uIK3asUuNRk7IPBqxweoZmUbywC0N4ik1sC1UEAIJxXQm8GT2JVGJYvTwlIgi/Ay
> >lg3Fx908MwswKhLjxAWHUE5zdreG7IECTXmKdjmsKXpJmsj61YhV5HrD9zkXQ8YH
> >Fd6bpHaq0ag=
> >=lgkD
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >________________________________________________________
> >NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you?
> >Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
> >http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
> >
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
References: