Re: A86: NOT Question on tile maps :-)

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: NOT Question on tile maps :-)
From: TGaArdvark@aol.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:49:03 EST
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


> no, there IS 16k at ram page 1.  however, the amount of usable ram is 
> slightly
>  less.  it's just that, if you want to be technical about it, it DOES have 
> 16k
>  or ram.

Thank you for correcting me on that slight technical misphrasing.
Yes, there IS 16k, but the floating-point stack takes the last
hundred bytes or so.  If you needed all 16k, you could move
the stack and move it back later provided you make no floating-
point ROM calls.  Probably not worth it.

Prev: Re: A86: NOT Question on tile maps :-)
Next: Re: A86: NOT Question on tile maps :-)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread