RE: A86: Re: Bug in TI86EMU?

To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: A86: Re: Bug in TI86EMU?
From: "Jeremy Goetsch" <jeremy@stupidzone.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 19:45:04 -0700
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19980928193956.007c8590@tfs.net>
Mail-For: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


Supposedly because you are jumping to that memory location. I think it's odd
as well, especially since when you jump to a literal value you don't put
parentheses.

Some Z80 mnemonic definitions I've found use "jp hl", and others use "jp
(hl)". I've seen the same discrepancy with "out (N)" or "out N". I guess the
opcodes come out the same so it doesn't really matter.

  - Jeremy G.

>
>
> Hmm, that explains alot.  Then why the indirection?  Why not just JP HL?
>
> >
> >No, <jp (hl)> is supossed to jump to HL.  If you want to fix it
> do <call $33
> >/ jp (hl)>
> >
> >
>
> --
> David Phillips
> mailto:electrum@tfs.net
> ICQ: 13811951
> AOL/AIM: Electrum32
>

References:

Re: A86: Re: Bug in TI86EMU?

From: David Phillips <electrum@tfs.net>

Prev: Re: A86: Re: Re: help with 16-bit vars
Next: Re: A86: convert
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread