Re: A86: Re: Bug in TI86EMU?

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Bug in TI86EMU?
From: David Phillips <electrum@tfs.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 19:39:57 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

Hmm, that explains alot.  Then why the indirection?  Why not just JP HL?

What is call $33?  Is it LD HL,(HL)?  I'd appreciate any code faster than
this:

ld e,(hl)	; 7
inc hl		; 6
ld d,(hl)	; 7
ex de,hl	; 4
		; 24 t-states, DE = HL + 1, HL = (HL)

At 12:53 AM 9/28/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>No, <jp (hl)> is supossed to jump to HL.  If you want to fix it do <call $33
>/ jp (hl)>
>
>

--
David Phillips
mailto:electrum@tfs.net
ICQ: 13811951
AOL/AIM: Electrum32

Follow-Ups:

RE: A86: Re: Bug in TI86EMU?

From: "Jeremy Goetsch" <jeremy@stupidzone.com>

Prev: Re: A86: grphlink error
Next: Re: A86: grphlink error
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread