Re: A86: thoughts about the 89 test legality...

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: thoughts about the 89 test legality...
From: kimo <kimo@iland.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 23:02:37 +0000
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <004d01bd4fce$6c303d80$5504dacd@joemama.minot>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


I'm thinking the HP48 does have an ir port.  And they are allowed on the
ACT's.  I took them a couple of months ago and the lady said that any
calculators with an ir port must have the port covered with opaque tape.  


At 04:54 AM 3/15/98 , you wrote:
---      ---
---      ---doesnt HP48 have an ir port? or just the HP48GX? well if the
regular 48
---      ---does, then its not allowed on tests anyway...also someday they
might not
---      ---allow graphx calcs on the tests even cuz of the experiments
that that one
---      ---student did at MIT that used radio waves to send commands to
the calc...
---      ---
---      --->HP48's have symbolic manipulation, etc, as well, and are
allowed on the
---      ---tests.
---      --->In actuallity, in terms of SAT's and ACT's, they really
wouldn't help too
---      ---much,
---      --- 

Alex
You can . . .

Visit my TI-85/86 Webpage at: 

http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/coding/190/index.html 
Or Email me at: 
kimo@iland.net 

Just don't use Microsoft Internet Explorer!  Okay?

References:

Re: A86: thoughts about the 89 test legality...

From: "Trey Jazz" <joemama@minot.com>

Prev: A86: Re: help
Next: Re: A86: thoughts about the 89 test legality...
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread