Re: A86: thoughts about the 89 test legality...

To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A86: thoughts about the 89 test legality...
From: "Trey Jazz" <joemama@minot.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 22:54:13 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


doesnt HP48 have an ir port? or just the HP48GX? well if the regular 48
does, then its not allowed on tests anyway...also someday they might not
allow graphx calcs on the tests even cuz of the experiments that that one
student did at MIT that used radio waves to send commands to the calc...

>HP48's have symbolic manipulation, etc, as well, and are allowed on the
tests.
>In actuallity, in terms of SAT's and ACT's, they really wouldn't help too
much,

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: thoughts about the 89 test legality...

From: kimo <kimo@iland.net>

Prev: A86: Re: icq
Next: Re: A86: Re: icq
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread