Re: A86: a couple questions that have been building up...

Re: A86: a couple questions that have been building up...

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A86: a couple questions that have been building up...
• From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
• Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 23:37:30 -0600
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• References: <b99ea55a.358db649@aol.com> <19980622.033133.4590.0.rabidcow@juno.com> <358ED609.AB94B283@eden.rutgers.edu> <19980622.203616.16358.0.rabidcow@juno.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

> also, the length byte for a variable name goes in _OP1+1, _OP1 holds the
> type byte
>

Thanks.  That was the problem.

> why are you using absolute addresses so much?
> this finishes what your code did without so much abs addr work:

Well, I didn't want it to cross over pages.  I suppose that isn't worryable,
but I have it working with abs addr now anyways.

• Re: A86: a couple questions that have been building up...
• From: ComAsYuAre@aol.com
• Re: A86: a couple questions that have been building up...
• From: rabidcow@juno.com
• Re: A86: a couple questions that have been building up...
• From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
• Re: A86: a couple questions that have been building up...
• From: rabidcow@juno.com

• Prev: Re: A86: a couple questions that have been building up...
• Next: Re: A86: Suggestions for improving the mailing list
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread