Re: A86: Windows 98

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Windows 98
From: gussie@alaska.net (Grant Stockly)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 23:50:10 -0700
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


>>Why?  Win95 uses lots of Windows 3.1 components and resources...  :)
>
>
>Well I think it has to use ..some.. 16-bit code for compatibility purposes
>with 3.1 software. But who cares, everything
>is for 95 anyway so it is still much more stable operating system.
>
>Linux is cool too, just a pain in the ass to setup. I think Linux is best
>for networking machines, since the OS is free.
>Did they ever finish that 68k port of linux? Linux on an Amiga would be
>sweeeet ;)

They've had amiga on mot 68k chips for a long time...

If you think RedHat is hard to install, have you ever tried installing 98
or 95?  :)

Prev: Re: A86: Windows 98
Next: Re: A86: Poor poor Windows users... :)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread