Re: A86: Windows 98

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Windows 98
From: gussie@alaska.net (Grant Stockly)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 18:22:22 -0700
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


Why?  Win95 uses lots of Windows 3.1 components and resources...  :)

>>Windows 3.1 + extras + FAT32 = win98
>
>Comparing 95/98/NT to 3.11 is very very harsh.
>
>Windows 95 is sooo much better for so many reasons.
>ala Flat Memory Model.. etc.
>
>Later,
>    Matt
>
>>>What is Plus 98? Is it like that Plus "theme" thing? How does it Measure
>up
>>>to k2? for scenes from K2 goto <http://www.kaleidoscope.net/new-k2.shtml>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The full version has been released to the OEM's briefly, but is not
>>>>officially out yet though. I managed to get my
>>>>hands on the FULL version of both Win 98 and MS Plus 98, NOT Beta 3. I
>know
>>>>a guy who knows a guy who was roommates
>>>>with a guy who... well never mind ;-)
>>>---
>>>I pledge allegiance to the Mac of Apple Computer Incorporated, and to the
>>>developers for which it stands, one platform, under Jobs, indestructible,
>>>with creativity and multimedia for all.
>>
>>
>>

Prev: Re: A86: Windows 98
Next: Re: A86: Windows 98
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread