Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..
Well, if it's not, it sure wouldn't be the first bug in a Microsoft
product. Especially Windows.
At 07:40 PM 6/2/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>ComAsYuAre@aol.com wrote:
>
>> In a message dated 6/2/98 6:57:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>> brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us writes:
>>
>> > 2000 is a leap year and 2000 is divisible by 100. If a year is
divisible by
>> > 100
>> > and not 400, then it is not a leap year.
>> >
>>
>> so divisible by 4, but not 400? i guess....gotta check on that
>>
>> i thought 2000 was not a leap year, though
>
>No, not totally correct there. 2000 is a leap year. If it's not, go tell
Bill
>Gates to fix win95 because win95 says it is.
>
>Every year divisible by 4 is a leap year...EXCEPT century years that are not
>divisible by 400 (ie 1700, 1800, 1900).
>
>--
>Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> File Archives, HTML, and Support
> the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>
>
>
// David Phillips
// mailto:electrum@tfs.net
// AIM: electrum32
References: