Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..

Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..
• From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 19:40:08 -0400
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• References: <cec6066b.35748b0d@aol.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

ComAsYuAre@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 6/2/98 6:57:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us writes:
>
> > 2000 is a leap year and 2000 is divisible by 100.  If a year is divisible by
> > 100
> >  and not 400, then it is not a leap year.
> >
>
> so divisible by 4, but not 400?  i guess....gotta check on that
>
> i thought 2000 was not a leap year, though

No, not totally correct there.  2000 is a leap year.  If it's not, go tell Bill
Gates to fix win95 because win95 says it is.

Every year divisible by 4 is a leap year...EXCEPT century years that are not
divisible by 400 (ie 1700, 1800, 1900).

--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

• Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..
• From: David Phillips <electrum@tfs.net>

• Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..
• From: ComAsYuAre@aol.com

• Prev: Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..
• Next: Re: A86: Confirm Calendar Bug..
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread