Re: A86: TI-86 ROM Versions

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: TI-86 ROM Versions
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 1998 16:33:16 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <01bda854$d85f85e0$9a50f482@win95.swipnet.se>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


Thomas Bladh wrote:

> Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us> wrote:
>
> >
> >Thomas Bladh wrote:
> >
> >> I have ROM version 1.4
> >>
> >> Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Is 1.2 and 1.3 the _only_ ROM versions that exist for the TI-86?  Is
> >> >there a 1.0, 1.1, or 1.4?
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> >> >   File Archives, HTML, and Support
> >> >   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
> >> >
> >
> >Can you please test something for me?  Make a BASIC program on your 86.
> >And type these 2 lines in:
> >
> >Line(1,1,2,2
> >Line(1,1,2,2,0
> >
> >On TI-86's with ROM 1.2 and 1.3, the 2nd line gives a "invalid argument"
> >error, but it is supposed to work according to the manual.  I am
> >wondering if TI fixed this in 1.4.
> >
> >--
> >Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> >   File Archives, HTML, Features, and Support
> >   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
> >
>
> My swedish manual say's the same thing but I'm sorry
> to say that it doesn't work on ROM 1.4 either.

Ok.  I was informed that its not a bug in the TI-86, its a misprint in the
manual.

--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, HTML, Features, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

References:

Re: A86: TI-86 ROM Versions

From: "Thomas Bladh" <tiberius@swipnet.se>