RE: A86: Re: Frogger

To: "'assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org'" <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: A86: Re: Frogger
From: Christopher Kalos <raptorone@stuytech.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 19:01:55 -0500
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

wait a minute, how is that processor intensive?  it would be like plainjump, only with a frog instead of a marble.  there's a bit more to think about, but a sprite engine might work.  Also, daedalus.  1st person is quite possible, it's just a matter of coding it well.
Christopher Kalos
raptorone@stuytech.com
Executive Director/Administrator
Virtual Technologies Developer's Group


----------
From: 	Joshua Szmajda[SMTP:dariusa@erols.com]
Sent: 	Wednesday, December 03, 1997 5:49 AM
To: 	assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: 	Re: A86: Re: Frogger


>How about doing it in a 1st person perspective? Or from over the frogs
>"shoulder" or behind his head.  It would be hard to pull off yet it would
>be a great success.


ok, now that's a bit excessive.  It's a calculator, for god's sake, not a
pentium ;)
oh, and about a previous message with 'bigger is better' - I don't know
about you, but there's a space limitation on my calc, and I'm not going to
put a huge game on to take up all my space when I could have lots of other,
smaller games which are just as entertaining.  This may be something for the
coder to consider ;)

Warning: Could not process part with given Content-Type: application/ms-tnef

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: Re: Frogger

From: TreyJazz <joemama@minot.com>