Re: A85: ROM Disassembly

To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A85: ROM Disassembly
From: mgp4007@omega.uta.edu (Michael Pearce)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 17:15:30 GMT
Delivered-To: assembly-85-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.95.980928185503.14781G-100000@bohr.gbar.dtu.dk>
References: <Pine.HPP.3.95.980928185503.14781G-100000@bohr.gbar.dtu.dk>
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org


i definitely think that if you wanted to share your hard work (which
you have been doing for a long time) that 3.0A would be the best ROM
to use.

-mike pearce

On Mon, 28 Sep 1998 18:57:35 +0200 (METDST), you wrote:

>
>Since I have been doing this stuff for a long time, I have found a lot of
>functions which are not listed in TI-ROM.TXT yet. I have also commented
>most of the function (to make things easier for my self). If anyone else
>wants to find functions I suggest that ROM version 3.0A is used, since
>that is what I have been using. By doing this all the stuff I have written
>down could easyly be used to find even more information.
>
>Dines
>
>__________________________________________
>
>Dines Justesen
>Email: c958362@student.dtu.dk
>WWW  : http://www.student.dtu.dk/~c958362/
>__________________________________________
>
>On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Mike Bandsmer wrote:
>
>> 
>> If you're going to do a joint project to find the addresses of many
>> routines, keep in mind that different ROM versions have different
>> locations for the (almost) same code.  Perhaps it would be wise to agree
>> to work with a single ROM version for such a joint project.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>

References:

Re: A85: ROM Disassembly

From: Dines Christy Justesen <c958362@student.dtu.dk>