Re: A85: Usgard 1.1 release

Re: A85: Usgard 1.1 release

• To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A85: Usgard 1.1 release
• From: 82nd Deer <eviljim@megsinet.net>
• Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 17:52:54 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <341A483A.6980@algonet.se>
• References: <01BCBEFA.75798190@rasm03.feldkirch.computerhaus.at> <341879B6.396D853A@erols.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org

I don't think WinLib added so much to it, except for the fact it used
explorer, too.  He did include the source, though.

>Since I haven't heard anything from Sam Davies for some time, I guess I
>could make it. It won't require winlib as the previous custcust did (?)
>
>-- 
>Jimmy Mårdell                "The nice thing about standards is that 
>mailto:mja@algonet.se         there are so many of them to choose from."
>http://www.algonet.se/~mja    
>IRC: Yarin                   "Sanity? I'm sure I have it on tape
>somewhere!"
>
>
---
Evil Jim
Viva La Mexico
<eviljim@writeme.com>
http://members.tripod.com/~eviljim/
I want to die in my sleep like my Grandfather, not screaming in pain like
the passengers in my car...

• A85: Usgard 1.1 release
• From: ess.andreas@computerhaus.at (Ess Andreas)
• Re: A85: Usgard 1.1 release
• From: Tony Lieuallen <arantius@erols.com>
• Re: A85: Usgard 1.1 release
• From: Jimmy Mårdell <mja@algonet.se>

• Prev: Re: A85: getting Usgard to work?
• Next: Re: A85: RAM FAIL
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread