Re: A85: Rigel, where'd it go??

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A85: Rigel, where'd it go??

>	As I pointed out, only the programmer would have to worry about the
>many libraries (If one can call them libraries, a more accurate name
>would be functions).  The non-assembly-literate user would not even know
>that the libraries are there.  All he (or she) would have to do is unzip
>a certain file into the libs directory (or something similar). After
>that, all that the user would have to do is select the programs he wants
>on his calculator in a certain computer program, and receive a backup
>file with the functions already in it (grouped into a single 85s file). 
>That is much faster than actually transporting 10 different large
>libraries, seperately,  using the link program as one has to do now. 
>Right now, libraries are loaded by the users.  As I propose, the
>computer would handle collecting all the functions into a library and
>attaching it to the porgrams.  Unlike people, the computer does not care
>how many libraries are needed.  (And technically there would only be one
>customized library - there would just be a choice of 100 functions that
>can be in it).

No, because transmitting would be a problem.  75% of people with Z-Shell or
ASM on their calculator do not have a graph link.
References: