Re: A85: Re: Ticalc bias


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A85: Re: Ticalc bias



I agree that there are way to many shells out there right now & I can't
believe more are still being made.  What is the most annoying it that
all of the new shells think that they are so awesome that they have to
have games that only run on them.  The only answer to the problems that
have been created by all of these shells is too have the writers of the
shells get together & add all of the shells individual special features
into one shell that would have that neat memory trick that PhatOS has
where you can convert strings to different types and then display them
on a separate menu, the interface of Usgard (the shell I use) because it
is so darn good, the size of Rigels, but most of all it would have to be
able to run all of the games that were written for each one of the
shells currently in existence.  And if you are currently writing a new
shell for the TI-85 STOP & make a game.
-Mic Mullins
Sometimes I miss just having ZShell

Michael Young wrote:

> yea, people should stop making shells and concentrate on games
> i don't want the 86 to take over the throne.  what ever happened to
> the
> will to make more.
> ASM GAMES FOR THE TI's                         SHELLS FOR THE TI's
>         TI-82- 23                                                  a
> few
>         TI-83- 42                                                  a
> couple
>         TI-85-126                                                  too
>
> many
>         TI 86-18 and steadily increasing                 two i think
>         TI-92- 76
> fargo
>
> You know what would kick @$$, a real time stratigy like command and
> conquer
> i have seen a game called hexagon something, it was pretty cool but it
>
> wasn't real time.
> We have DOOM, daedalus, lappy
> We have some fairly good racing games, zcart3d, megarace
> We have a shit load of puzzle games, ztetris, boxes, load runner which
> is
> awesome.
> what is the point in making all of these damn shells when sooner or
> later
> there isn't going to be any games to play them on.  The only point I
> see
> is to make them smaller, like rigel at only .3K
> This is like Intel, first the 286, wow!  then comes the 386 holy
> moley,
> then the 486
> now thats speed, then PENTIUM!, amazing! then MMX, pointless, then P2
> the
> next generation. or like that dumb @$$ Bill Gatez 666.  DOS, windows,
> windows 95, slow down!  Some of you think i am crazy,
> wEll i aM!
> i made the mistake of buying a ti 85 instead of an 86
> maybe it wasn't a mistake but when i think about the potental of that
> 96
> (not all user avail.) i get a headache.  By the way does anyone make
> and
> sell memory expantions for the link port, cuz i need one.  That is
> after
> i get the damn thing back from texas because of a funked up link port.
>
> Then i go to radio shack and buy two female 2.5 mm stereo ports.
> Stereo
> my ass, they only make two out of the three damn connections.  If you
> know anything about circuits which you all probably do you know that 2
>
> out of three won't cut it.  Actually i started to get into calcs a
> year
> ago.  my mom took me to walmart and i got to choose between two
> calcs...
> THE CASIO CFX-9800G with color graphing, fractions, etc, etc
>                                      or the
>                                        ti85
>
> guess what i chose.  talk about horror.  the casio cfx9800g has no
> getkey, no output like locate.  just a piece of schiB editor.  the
> only
> thing that it is good at was graphing and other stuff like math,
> algebra,
> geometry.
>
> I went through denial.  "thats impossible!", but it was true.  I was
> stuck with something more useless then a ti-81.  so what did i do?  I
> searched for an answer. the quest for the holy grail. I, again chose
> the
> wrong goblet (indiana jones and the last crusade)
> THE CFX-9850G with getkey
> wow, amazing, what a waste of silicon and plastic.
> I then attempted to make my first real game in the stone age editor of
>
> the $90 cfx9850g with GETKEY wow (sarcasim).
> i made space invaders.'
> it was so damn slow.  were talking worst then running daedalus on a
> nonturbo ti85.
> I then stopped kidding my self when i saw how incredibally slow it
> was.
> I took it back to walmart and traded it in for a T I - 8 5! and
> walmart
> picked up the tab thanks to there return policy. (thanks sam walton,
> rest
> in peace)  I was so excited i built my link to my compaq pentium
> overdrive 83MHz out of wires i founnd around the house, i turned that
> $6
> parallel link into a 19 cent parallel link.
> i stuck those wires in to the parallel port and used the diodes from
> my
> 60 in one electronics projects lab and fired away.  It worked.
> ouch my carp tunnels
>   __                     __              _______________
> // / / //                \\ \ \ \\         /
> \
> | | | | /                 \ | | |  |        |    O W w w w !      |
> \     /                   \      /        |
> |
>  |   |                      |    |         \ _______________/
>                                            |/
>                                                          -mike
> young10@juno.com
>
> ps. someone start working on that C&C game
>       suceed and you will be the all time hero of asm programming
>       kinda like andreas ess from AUSTRIA, not the land down under
>
> "you cun liv un it, but it tastes lik shit"
>                                       -croc dundee




Follow-Ups: References: