A85: Re: Ticalc bias

To: <assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: A85: Re: Ticalc bias
From: "Donna S. Zimmerman" <gramdon@mail2.theonramp.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 16:23:29 -0500
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org

I think that since many of the shells out there are very similar, ticalc
may not want to load up their archives with millions new folders for the
ridiculous number of shells.

Jeff Zimmerman
Gramdon@mail2.theonramp.net

----------
> From: Michael Pearce <mgp4007@omega.uta.edu>
> To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: A85: Ticalc bias
> Date: Saturday, November 01, 1997 3:56 PM
> 
> Does anyone else thing that is unfair for ticalc.org to only give
> Usgard its own directories for games and such?  There are some other
> shells out there that are more than just a zshell clone, and they also
> deserve their own directories (most notably, Rigel and PhatOS).  It
> would seem to me that ticalc wants a specific shell to be chosen over
> another.  Of course, that decision should not be imposed by ticalc.
> 
> -mike
> mgp4007@omega.uta.edu

Follow-Ups:

Re: A85: Re: Ticalc bias

From: mgp4007@omega.uta.edu (Michael Pearce)

A85: Re: Ticalc bias

From: young10@juno.com (Michael Young)