Re: LZ: Usgard

To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: LZ: Usgard
From: "some guy" <houston00@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 06:52:36 PDT
Reply-To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org




>To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org
>Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 18:58:41 CDT
>Subject: Re: LZ: Usgard
>From: jim.reardon@juno.com (Jim Reardon)
>
>I'm not saying it does, but I am saying libraries are space saving
>mechinisms, because most non-grayscale programs use one of the two 
sprite
>routines in the library.
>

True... PutSprite is my favorite routine, and I used it in most of my 
games, but what if I wanted to customize it? Like xor'ing the sprite or 
writing it to graph_mem? Then the lib would be useless.  NASR isn't much 
good except for bigger sprites. Even if everyone used the exact same 
sprite routine then shouldn't there be no libs and have the routine 
inside the Usgard string? I don't see much use for the other libs, 
especially since there are so many ZShell games out there that will 
never use libs although they may share some functions.

houston00@hotmail.com 


---------------------------------------------------------
Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:

Re: LZ: Usgard

From: jim.reardon@juno.com (Jim Reardon)

Prev: Re: LZ: Re: Lost Memmory in USGARD
Next: Re: LZ: Usgard
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread