Re: LZ: Usgard

To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: LZ: Usgard
From: Tony Lieuallen <arantius@erols.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 15:56:25 -0400
Organization: completely unorganized!
References: <19970611.022305.10486.4.Jim.Reardon@juno.com> <339EDB44.2A8C@mindspring.com>
Reply-To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org

> ZShell is dead.  There is no reason to use ZShell over CShell.

I agree, but I definetly think that CShell is NOT dead.  Too many people
don't have an expander, or at least a graphlink, and usgard is just too
big right now (sure, it's 2.8k, plus 4-5k of libraries, and apparently
4k of 'lost' memory.)
-- 
            ''~``
           ( o o )
  ____.oooO__(_)__Oooo.__________
 /  Tony Lieuallen               \
[ arantius@erols.com              ]
[    .oooO http://gifs.home.ml.org]
[    (   )   Oooo.                ]
 \____\ (____(   )_______________/
       \_)    ) /
             (_/

References:

LZ: Usgard

From: jim.reardon@juno.com (Jim Reardon)

Re: LZ: Usgard

From: Daniel Walls <flinn@mindspring.com>

Prev: Re: LZ: Usgard
Next: LZ: My thoughts on USGARD
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread