Re: LZ:83 ASM

Subject: Re: LZ:83 ASM
From: Ryan Myers <rmyers@teleport.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 20:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.07.9608262143.A25708-9100000@login>

On Mon, 26 Aug 1996, Andrew Haninger wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Aug 1996, Digital Dreamer wrote:
>
> > MShell, I beleive, is like ZShell for the TI-92.
> >
> > dreamer
> i don't think so. i would guess that mshell is like zshell for the 83
> because zshell for the 92 is fargo unless mshell is fargo's name now. i'm
> confused....
> how 'bout this:

> ti-83=mshell(i'm guessing)
> ti-85=zshell(duh!)
> ti-92=fargo
>
>

Nope.  83 needs NO shell at all, the support is built directly into it by
TI.  You type "Send(9#######" where the #'s are the name of the program
string, and it loads it into the right spot and runs it.  This was BUILT
IN BY TI!

Ryan Myers
rmyers@teleport.com
http://www.teleport.com/~rmyers/
-- "One useless man is a disgrace.  Two useless men are a burden to
-- society.  Three or more useless men means Congress is in session."

References:

From: