[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)
From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:38:42 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4790.63.100.91.176.1043857539.squirrel@webmail.itmom.com>
References: <20030129114341.7f80ee1c.tijl@ulyssis.org> <4790.63.100.91.176.1043857539.squirrel@webmail.itmom.com>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:25:39 -0600 (CST), corey@acz.org wrote:

> They 'key' and I stress 'key' problem with that is compatibility.
> 
> Either you keep a bad version of a library call and allow 
> compatibility or you change it and make everyone change their 
> programs.
> 
> Since this isn't a shell, there's no set grouping for each library 
> really.
> 
> This 'could' be avoided but would be a big headache if using 
> libraries in that manner.

I'm not familiar with C, but I suppose this can be solved using a jump
table, just as all calcs have for their romcalls.

Follow-Ups:

[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

From: Brandon Sterner <bms9019@rit.edu>

References:

[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>

[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

From: <corey@acz.org>