[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)
From: <corey@acz.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:26:06 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <20030129114341.7f80ee1c.tijl@ulyssis.org>
References: <20030129114341.7f80ee1c.tijl@ulyssis.org>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

The same goes for upgrading the format of the library.

corey

> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:13:43 -0500, Gavin Olson wrote:
> 
>> Yeah.  Libs are a pain.  There is a generation of programs for 
the
>> TI-89 that require a combination of libraries, with differing 
levels
>> of support for OS and hardware (damn the 89's hardware rev!)
>> revisions.  The newer generation of programs requiring no libs 
are
>> much easier to deal with.  Of course, the 89 has way more 
room to
>> waste on redundant code, too.  Perhaps you could do this:  
When a
>> program runs, it checks for other programs using the libs.  If it
>> finds one, it points itself to the program with the libs and 
deletes
>> its own set of the libs.  This leads to problems if you delete the
>> first program to be run on the calc, but allows you to include 
libs in
>> every program but only have one copy on-calc.
> 
> It would be easier to put libc in an app. Plenty of space there. 
83+
> only then though.

References:

[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>