[A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]
From: Gavin Olson <gtolson@pop.snet.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:53:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020110165730.0360c1c0@pop.home.se>
References: <20020110140241.14698.qmail@web13804.mail.yahoo.com> <000601c199c2$4a58c000$6501a8c0@brinstar>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

At 04:58 PM 1/10/02 +0100, you wrote:

>At 15:02 2002-01-10, you wrote:
> >I don't want to start another XP discussion, but if your computer is
> >powerful enough and if you are able to use it, XP works better than any
> >other Windows version.
>
>On my computer, windows 2000 works much better then XP.
>But I'm sure that if you upgrade from 98 or ME, XP feels like a giant leap.
>
>///Olle

Any particular reason?  I thought that it was still the taskbar approach, 
but with nicer graphics.

OT: WinMe supplies the System Restore option to fix bad things happening, 
but what happens when the bad thing is system restore? I need to restore my 
system to a point at which System Restore was working.

References:

[A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]

From: Burak "Gül" <eniyi@yahoo.com>

[A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]

From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>

[A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]

From: Olle Hedman <alh@home.se>