[A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]
From: Gavin Olson <gtolson@pop.snet.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:08:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <000601c199c2$4a58c000$6501a8c0@brinstar>
References: <20020110102342.32342.qmail@web13805.mail.yahoo.com> <00a901c199c1$e792cce0$d905040a@tijl>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


At 04:33 AM 1/10/02 -0600, you wrote:

>Why NT 5.1 instead of NT 6.0?
>
>Although XP is in almost every way a downgrade...
>
> > They called it Voyage 200 for the same reason MS called WinNT 5.1: Windows
> > XP. The name implies a powerful product, where TI92+SE, while the most
>logic
> > one to choose, feels empty.


To calculate Windows version numbers beyond 98SE, take 4.11 and subtract 
the number of versions.

References:

[A83] Re: VoyageT_200

From: Burak "Gül" <eniyi@yahoo.com>

[A83] Re: VoyageT_200

From: "Tijl Coosemans" <tijl@ulyssis.org>

[A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]

From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>