Why do we use this routine: (33 clocks)
LCD_BUSY::
PUSH AF
inc hl
dec hl
POP AF
RET
When we could use this one: (32, could change it to be 33?)
LCD_BUSY:
halt
halt
halt
halt
halt
halt
halt
halt
ret
Sure, it's four bytes larger, but I thought halt saves on battery life. Is this one of TI's oversights, or am I completely wrong???
Bob Maresh