[A83] Re: Apps: part II

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: Apps: part II
From: Harper Maddox <gte172i@prism.gatech.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 20:46:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <001f01c0f9e9$b7e66600$0100a8c0@kingkong>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010620200332.00ab5930@pop.prism.gatech.edu> <007601c0f9e8$a8a21fa0$0200a8c0@pc2>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

At 05:32 PM 6/20/2001 -0700, you wrote:

>I prefer TASM over ZDS though. There are subtle differences I wouldn't want
>to live with. My reasoning is, if I've used TASM for years, and it works,
>why switch?
>
>--
>Michael Vincent

I have to appreciate someone who shares my line of thinking.  I've been 
using EMACS (for NT) to write my source code in, then compiling using 
Movax's old ZASM bat file since '98.  All that I want to do is change the 
batch file.

do i need to include the headers, ti83plus.inc  tokens.inc  when compiling 
an app, or is the procedure different?  humor me, ive never made an app.

-harper

Follow-Ups:

[A83] Re: Apps: part II

From: "Dan Englender" <dan@calc.org>

References:

[A83] Re: Apps: part II

From: Harper Maddox <gte172i@prism.gatech.edu>

[A83] Re: Apps: part II

From: "Dan Englender" <dan@calc.org>

[A83] Re: Apps: part II

From: "Michael Vincent" <hookman@worldnet.att.net>