Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

• To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
• From: "James Matthews" <jjj@matthewsfamily.fsnet.co.uk>
• Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:44:35 -0000
• References: <9.17c9eab.25c628c9@aol.com> <3894D2B3.808E6D8C@clara.net> <001501bf6b82$9e2af880$515b883e@default> <3894D884.3B28C58D@clara.net>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

> They got it free becvuase they beta tested the SDK for TI. You need to get your program
> cyrptographically signed by TI to make a Flash-APP. It costs $99 for the Education SDK
> (Three signings), and $300 for the Proffesional SDK (Ten signings).
>
> --Robin Kay--

Hehe, ok...that's why :)...I suppose I might get it free too, then.

But, with respect to your OS idea...I dunno. You seem quite adamant about your
multitasking idea, but I've got my doubts like Jason. Firstly, remember with your
interrupts that none of the registers can change -- so that basically means no ROM Calls,
which REALLY limits what you could achieve with multitasking. Secondly, why the hell would
you wanna do it anyway?

Later,

James.

• Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
• From: Robin Kay <kaypictures@clara.net>
• Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
• From: Robin Kay <kaypictures@clara.net>

• Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
• From: Jkhum98@aol.com
• Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
• From: Robin Kay <kaypictures@clara.net>
• Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
• From: "James Matthews" <jjj@matthewsfamily.fsnet.co.uk>
• Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
• From: Robin Kay <kaypictures@clara.net>

• Prev: Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
• Next: Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread