Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?

Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?

• To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: "Barubary" <barubary@home.com>
• Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 18:44:27 -0700
• References: <001a01bf0c81$ea457c00$e1b40118@CX660765B> <19991001222909.A784@localhost.localdomain> <004201bf0d31$6840f7b0$e1b40118@CX660765B> <19991002193123.A612@localhost.localdomain>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

> Yeah, I have the sdk :P

See my point about secrecy?  CrASH's source would be out if CrASH_Man
wouldn't complain about it.

> Fine, put a jump table at 4000h-5FFFh... then redo then entire RAM
> including the VATs and you might be able to emulate a TI-83... of
> course, you'd have to esacpe the x+$C000 crash problem as well as other
> crash wierdness that occurs when you access RAM/ROM outside the area of
> progstart+8k

If the calculator is crashing if you try to read past C000, it's because TI
doesn't want to let you.  That's what a disassembler is for.  It's obviously
possible to map the 32k of RAM into 8000-FFFF.

As for redoing RAM, you don't need that because you can patch games.

-- Barubary

• A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: "Barubary" <barubary@home.com>
• Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: Joe Wingbermuehle <joewing@usmo.com>
• Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: "Barubary" <barubary@home.com>
• Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: Joe Wingbermuehle <joewing@usmo.com>

• Prev: Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• Next: Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread