Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?

Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?

• To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: Joe Wingbermuehle <joewing@usmo.com>
• Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 19:31:23 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <004201bf0d31$6840f7b0$e1b40118@CX660765B>
• References: <001a01bf0c81$ea457c00$e1b40118@CX660765B> <19991001222909.A784@localhost.localdomain> <004201bf0d31$6840f7b0$e1b40118@CX660765B>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

Yeah, I have the sdk :P
Fine, put a jump table at 4000h-5FFFh... then redo then entire RAM
including the VATs and you might be able to emulate a TI-83... of
course, you'd have to esacpe the x+$C000 crash problem as well as other
crash wierdness that occurs when you access RAM/ROM outside the area of
progstart+8k

Thus spoke Barubary <barubary@home.com>:
> 
> Yeah.  You don't have 1/3 of the ROM calls needed to port Penguins to the
> 83+.  That's the first thing I could beat you at.  Then I'm make a jump
> table at 4000-5FFF that supports original 83 programs.  Me and a friend
> wrote CrASH, probably the best coded OS ever considering the limitations we
> had (1000 bytes max).
> 
> -- Barubary
> 
> > Hilarious!
> 
> 

-- 
Joe Wingbermuehle
http://joewing.calc.org

• Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: Nathan Gaylinn <NathanG@firstva.com>
• Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: "Barubary" <barubary@home.com>

• A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: "Barubary" <barubary@home.com>
• Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: Joe Wingbermuehle <joewing@usmo.com>
• Re: A83: How is it that ION was made?
• From: "Barubary" <barubary@home.com>

• Prev: Re: A83: Random
• Next: Re: A83: Stranded - announcement
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread