Re: A83: Sub-routines
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83: Sub-routines
First of all, there are much better programming languages than VB, for
example, Borland C++ Builder. It has all the functionality of VB but is C++,
a much more powerful and versatile programming language (IMHO, the best
language out there).
Second of all, the Z80 compilers are for DOS because Windows didn't exist
when the makers of Z80 created the compiler. The Z80 is a VERY old
processor, my dad used one decades ago, before the silicon chip. You're
lucky there's a compiler for PCs at all.
Also, no one has created a new compiler for Windows because there is no need
to, the DOS one works just fine, and compilers are very hard to write. They
take months if not years to make.
Well, that's my 15.4 cents.
-David Clamage
zapo.calc.org
In a message dated 16-05-99 9:55:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Edub311@aol.com
writes:
> And why are all assemblers in C++ and stuff, and all in DOS? Wouldn't a VB
> application be much easier and user friendly (remember DOS syntax)??? And
> you
> wouldn't have to open a DOS box either, whoa!
>
Follow-Ups: