Re: A83: (no subject)

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A83: (no subject)
From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 17:29:14 -0500
References: <0.b9b6b854.25954851@aol.com> <043f01bf4e5b$b78413a0$05300923@valpo.edu> <00e001bf4e5e$2b6fc1e0$7fd279c3@default>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


>From a mathematical view, 2000 would be the start of the 3rd millenium if
the stupid Romans (or whoever it was) had remembered that there should be a
year 0.

--
Bryan Rabeler
rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu
http://www.msu.edu/~rabelerb/

"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - Lord
Acton

----- Original Message -----
From: "Laurens Holst" <laurensh1@yahoo.com>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, December 24, 1999 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: A83: (no subject)


>
> Well technically the guy who says the new milennium starts in 2001 is
right,
> since the start of the count now only (almost) 1999 years have passed.
> However, seeing it from a mathematical view, the year 2000 IS a milennium.
>
> So it's kind of a paradox, I think.
>
>
> ~Grauw
>
>
> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>           email me: laurensh@geocities.com or ICQ: 10196372
>              visit the Datax homepage at http://datax.cjb.net/
> MSX fair Bussum / MSX Marathon homepage: http://msxfair.cjb.net/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>
>

References:

Re: A83: (no subject)

From: AtmaZ@aol.com

Re: A83: (no subject)

From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

Re: A83: (no subject)

From: "Laurens Holst" <laurensh1@yahoo.com>