Re: A83: (no subject)

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A83: (no subject)
From: "Laurens Holst" <laurensh1@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 23:28:13 +0100
References: <0.b9b6b854.25954851@aol.com> <043f01bf4e5b$b78413a0$05300923@valpo.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


Well technically the guy who says the new milennium starts in 2001 is right,
since the start of the count now only (almost) 1999 years have passed.
However, seeing it from a mathematical view, the year 2000 IS a milennium.

So it's kind of a paradox, I think.


~Grauw


--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
          email me: laurensh@geocities.com or ICQ: 10196372
             visit the Datax homepage at http://datax.cjb.net/
MSX fair Bussum / MSX Marathon homepage: http://msxfair.cjb.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Follow-Ups:

Re: A83: (no subject)

From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

References:

Re: A83: (no subject)

From: AtmaZ@aol.com

Re: A83: (no subject)

From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>