Re: A83: ASM83-or-ASM89???

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A83: ASM83-or-ASM89???
From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 00:22:04 +0200
Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <yam7595.1004.275021624@smtp.softhome.net>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


sorry linus :)  typo...
I know the 68000 is very close to your heart :)
didn't want to upset you :)

//Olle

Linus Akesson wrote:
> 
> _32bit_ 68000 please... =)
> 
> Linus
> 
> On 18-Oct-98, Olle Hedman wrote:
> 
> >I have both the 83 and the 89..
> 
> >My oppinion is that the 83 is a much simpler beginners assembler because the
> >z80 in it is a simpler 8 bit processor and much more easy to learn than the
> >16bit 68000 in the ti89..
> 
> >but.. because of the simple z80.. som things are harder to do on it..  or
> >needs
> >a bit more thinking..
> >and the 68000 _is_ much more powerfull, and you can make much cooler games on
> >it
> >;)
> 
> >this is just my oppinion..  i like them both but in different ways :)
> 
> >//Olle
> 
> >ManjiLump@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >> I was just wondering what anyone thinks or knows about assembly for the 89.
> >I
> >> heard it was a lot easier than 83 asm. I might buy one for that reason, and
> >it
> >> has grayscale!
> >> But the 83 was what I started out on...should I leave the 83 and get the
> >newer
> >> better calc or stay with 83? Suggestions anyone?
> >>
> >> -Michael
> >>
> >> P.S.-What and how did you win something James?

References:

Re: A83: ASM83-or-ASM89???

From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>